Carbon emissions optimisation in prefabrication construction: A review of current design integrated approaches

Xiang, Y; Opoku, A and Florez-Perez, L (2021) Carbon emissions optimisation in prefabrication construction: A review of current design integrated approaches. In: Scott, L and Neilson, C J (eds.) Proceedings of 37th Annual ARCOM Conference, 6-7 September 2021, Online Event, UK.

Abstract

The construction industry is the overarching energy consumer and contributes to significant carbon emissions globally. Prefabricated construction has been adopted to alleviate the industry’s pressure on the environment. Thus, the number of scientific publications about the realisation of a sustainable built environment through prefabricated design has followed an exponential trend since 2015. However, it is still not a common practice to implement sustainability during the design stage. Therefore, this study critically reviewed relevant literature on current design tools to evaluate the remaining challenges. The general area of investigation in this research was embodied carbon emissions optimisation in the design phase. Its findings showed that, although assessing sustainability in the design stage had become a hotpot recently, current design assistant tools were ineffective for the designers to generate a sustainable design. Their limited reliability, creativity, and user-unfriendly process were claimed as barriers. In the end, this study proposed a framework for implementing carbon emissions' optimisation in the design phase and concludes by setting out the direction for further work in this area.

Item Type: Conference Paper (Paper)
Uncontrolled Keywords: carbon emissions; design integrated optimisation; prefabrication; sustainability
Index terms: design phase, built environment, design stage, investigation, construction industry, prefabrication, publication, integrated approach, embodied carbon, sustainable design, carbon emission, creativity, designer
Subjects: design process, innovation and creative processes, infrastructure and transport systems, industry analysis, building construction, climate science, environmental impact, research dissemination and communication, data collection methods, profession, professional practice, contractual arrangements
Topics: Information Management, Research Practice, Sustainability, Procurement, Construction Technology, Roles and Professions, Urban Studies, Design Practice
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here