Collett, M; Hardy, A; Meulemans, J and Glew, D (2022) Evaluating the performance of a high thermal mass dwelling: Comparing predictions and in-situ measurements. In: Tutesigensi, A and Neilson, C J (eds.) Proceedings of 38th Annual ARCOM Conference, 5-7 September 2022, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK.
Abstract
Improved building fabric performance is essential for the decarbonisation of buildings. Evaluating fabric performance is often predicted; but inaccuracies are present within commonly used prediction methodologies. Accurate measurement of building fabric is therefore advantageous when identifying the improvement made through retrofit. The QUB/e method is a practical and effective method of measuring the whole building performance in low-to-medium thermal mass properties. In this paper, a property of high thermal mass was studied for the first time with the QUB/e method. The results identify challenges in undertaking QUB/e measurements in the application of high thermal mass including the impact of stored solar heat contributions resulting in a wider dispersion of measurements. In the case presented; a significant prediction gap is identified when comparing the predicted and measured results. The implications of the prediction gap observed include a change in the regulatory EPC band of the property. Additionally, using performance measurements would avoid overestimations of the reported decarbonisation and annual cost saving benefits of future retrofit works to improve the property at 2.3 Tonnes of equivalent CO2 emissions and £570 respectively.
| Item Type: | Conference Paper (Paper) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | building performance; measurement; quality |
| Index terms: | cost saving, methodology, in-situ, building performance, CO2 emissions, performance measurement |
| Subjects: | quality assurance, building construction, research methods, economics, performance measurement, air quality |
| Topics: | Cost Management, Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Sustainability, Quality Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here