Kan, F K and Khalid, A G (2022) The decision-making behaviour of public procurement officers: An interplay between procedural rationality and groupthink bias. In: Tutesigensi, A and Neilson, C J (eds.) Proceedings of 38th Annual ARCOM Conference, 5-7 September 2022, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK.
Abstract
Malaysian public procurement has always been regulated by comprehensive procedures to enhance rationality in decision-making. Nevertheless, the public procurement is still plagued with recurring irregularities. This research investigates the opposing factors at play in between the individual decision-making process and the group decision-making environment. A research model was built on the notions of procedural rationality and groupthink to examine the outcome of individual procedural rationality under the influence of groupthink behaviour. The Partial Least Square-Structural Equation Modelling technique was employed to analyse 289 datasets from the Malaysian public procurement officers. The result showed that while procedural rationality is correlated strongly with groupthink, it had insignificant influence on the outcomes of groupthink - defective decision-making processes at the group level. Apparently, it fails to stop the defective decision-making process once the elements of groupthink have permeated the group. Recommendations are made for improving the composition of public procurement committees.
| Item Type: | Conference Paper (Paper) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | decision making; groupthink; procedural rationality; public procurement; structural equation modelling |
| Index terms: | rationality, decision-making process, structural equation modelling, bias, decision-making, partial least square, dataset |
| Subjects: | statistical analysis, decision analysis, data management, probability and distributions, decision-making and reasoning |
| Topics: | Digital Applications, Risk Management, Research Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here