Mkandawire, K; Kabiri, S; Mbugua, L and Connaughton, J (2022) Managing interfaces between offsite and onsite construction. In: Tutesigensi, A and Neilson, C J (eds.) Proceedings of 38th Annual ARCOM Conference, 5-7 September 2022, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK.
Abstract
Discrepancies such as tolerance mismatches during the incorporation of offsite components into onsite construction can give rise to buildability problems. This results in considerable rework and subsequently causes delays and cost increases. Improving current knowledge of these discrepancies could help reduce buildability problems. One important challenge in this regard is related to effective knowledge exchange across structural and organisational boundaries in construction projects. This study explores how knowledge in these boundaries is activated and exchanged. Distributed Situation Awareness (DSA) theory, as a sociotechnical tool, was used to focus on knowledge distribution between project parties. Semi-structured interviews with construction participants managing offsite construction projects in the UK were carried out. The preliminary findings show that different trade specific standards from suppliers can give rise to tolerance mismatches. The expected contribution of the study is on practical project management insights into ways of designing and managing interfaces in offsite construction to facilitate knowledge exchange related to discrepancies.
| Item Type: | Conference Paper (Paper) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | offsite construction; tolerance mismatch; buildability problems; distributed situation awareness |
| Index terms: | construction project, knowledge exchange, cost increase, mismatch, construction discrepancy, project management, boundaries, interview, onsite, buildability, rework, project party |
| Subjects: | project management theory and practice, production management, economics, design efficiency, building construction, sociology, data collection methods, engineering problems, contract obligations, knowledge management, property law, operations management |
| Topics: | Design Practice, Legal Issues, Cost Management, Information Management, Engineering Principles, Project Management, Research Practice, Stakeholder Management, Construction Technology |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here