Weerasinghe, A S; Rasheed, E O and Rotimi, J O B (2022) Evaluating how social psychological aspects affect the choices of occupant behaviours: A modified motivation, opportunity and ability framework approach. In: Tutesigensi, A and Neilson, C J (eds.) Proceedings of 38th Annual ARCOM Conference, 5-7 September 2022, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK.
Abstract
This study evaluates the impact of social psychological aspects on adaptive and nonadaptive occupant behaviours in offices. The evaluation is based on a survey synthesising previous research insights on social science theories, where subjective aspects were considered by adapting a modified motivation, opportunity, and ability framework. A questionnaire was distributed across the general office building population in New Zealand, and 247 valid answers were achieved. A Structural Equation Modelling (SEM) approach was used to evaluate the subjective effects on the choices of occupant behaviours. The results showed that the attitudes, personal norms, organisational support, behavioural interventions, and perceived knowledge (factor loadings >0.50) were significant indicators of adaptive behaviours and positively affected the choices of occupants' adaptive actions. Overall, the study outcomes enable the improvement of occupant energy saving behaviours by applying subjective aspects related to the office environment. Furthermore, this study provides insights for investigating occupants' social and psychological perspectives on energy saving in their workplaces amid the COVID-19 and post lockdown situations.
| Item Type: | Conference Paper (Paper) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | ability; motivation; occupant behaviours; opportunity; social psychology. |
| Index terms: | survey, motivation, office building, energy saving behaviour, adaptive behaviour, structural equation modelling, New Zealand, COVID-19, occupant behaviour, norms, psychology, loading, questionnaire, social science, population, energy-saving |
| Subjects: | health risk and incident analysis, theoretical framing, Geography, sociology, demography, behavioral psychology, statistical analysis, human factors, data collection methods, construction type, health behaviours and lifestyles, environmental behaviour, psychology, construction operations, energy systems |
| Topics: | Urban Studies, Human Resources, Site Management, Health and Safety, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Construction Technology, Sustainability |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here