Abdul Ghani, N and Tutesigensi, A (2023) Managing change in megaprojects. In: Tutesigensi, A and Neilson, C J (eds.) Proceedings of 39th Annual ARCOM Conference, 4-6 September 2023, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Abstract
Management of change is an important aspect of managing any construction project. Much of the literature on management of change in projects concerns changes managed as variations to construction contracts. These changes may be construed as first-order changes. On occasion, project changes are so radical that they cannot be managed as variations to the construction contract. Such radical changes are sometimes referred to as second-order changes. There is limited research undertaken about second-order changes in megaprojects. We argue that second-order changes in megaprojects can be analysed and explained using mainstream literature about managing organisational change. Hence, we adopted a systematic literature review methodology to determine a conceptual framework for managing radical changes in megaprojects. Specifically, an in-depth review of 25 organisational change management (CM) models was conducted. This resulted in the identification of the Association of Change Management Professionals' Standard for Change Management (ACMP-SCM) as an appropriate model with which management of change in megaprojects can be analysed. We argue that with the ACMP-SCM, we can critique how changes have been managed in past megaprojects as well as design and implement changes better in future megaprojects.
| Item Type: | Conference Paper (Paper) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | change management; megaprojects; project change; second-order change |
| Index terms: | construction contract, organizational change, change management, critique, megaproject, methodology, construction project, variation, management of change, systematic literature review, conceptual framework |
| Subjects: | management, evaluation and assessment methods, business, contractual condition, research methods, theoretical framing, strategic project management, contract type, production management, research evaluation and metrics |
| Topics: | Project Management, Research Practice, Organizational Design, Contract Administration, Procurement |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here