Enablers of community-inclusive decision-making for risk-sensitive urban planning: A TISM and MICMAC analysis

Geekiyanage, D; Fernando, T and Keraminiyage, K (2023) Enablers of community-inclusive decision-making for risk-sensitive urban planning: A TISM and MICMAC analysis. In: Tutesigensi, A and Neilson, C J (eds.) Proceedings of 39th Annual ARCOM Conference, 4-6 September 2023, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.

Abstract

Risk-sensitive urban planning (RSUP) is a novel approach to achieving sustainability in urban construction by bridging the gaps between silo approaches to disaster risk reduction, climate change adaptation and city planning. Community engagement is essential for achieving social sustainability in RSUP. However, existing approaches fail to promote supportive factors for community-driven decision-making, which impedes fostering of an inclusive planning approach in many emerging economies. This study, therefore, developed an interpretive model of enablers of community engagement in RSUP through interviews with industry and community participants in Sri Lanka. 19 enablers and 33 pair-wise links were identified, and total interpretive structural modelling (TISM) was used to develop a five-layer model with digital telecommunication infrastructure at the highest level. MICMAC analysis identified 5 driving enablers: digital telecommunication, field workers' support, communities' lived experience, international collaboration, and NGOs. Practitioners can benefit from the prioritised list of enablers, while policymakers can develop regulations to promote inclusive development. These factors can be incorporated into planning and decision-making to ensure that construction projects are designed, implemented, and managed in inclusive and responsive ways.

Item Type: Conference Paper (Paper)
Uncontrolled Keywords: developing countries; participatory development; structural modelling; sustainability; urban construction.
Index terms: regulation, community engagement, interview, developing country, practitioner, structural modelling, telecommunication, emerging economy, construction project, decision-making, social sustainability, collaboration, climate change, inclusive development, adaptation, urban planning, disaster risk reduction, interpretive structural modelling, Sri Lanka, city planning
Subjects: development economics, climate science, urban planning, production management, communities and social development, decision analysis, Geography, community and social dimensions, environmental hazards, data analysis and analytics, data collection methods, analytical methods, practitioner, communication, user focus, economic development, management, urban design, political science
Topics: Design Practice, International Construction, Engineering Principles, Stakeholder Management, Risk Management, Governance, Geographical Context, Organizational Design, Research Practice, Project Management, Sustainability, Roles and Professions
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here