Mkandawire, K; Kabiri, S and Connaughton, J (2023) Knowledge transaction between offsite and onsite interfaces. In: Tutesigensi, A and Neilson, C J (eds.) Proceedings of 39th Annual ARCOM Conference, 4-6 September 2023, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Abstract
Interface discrepancies continue to cause buildability problems when incorporating offsite elements/products into onsite construction. One important challenge in this regard is related to effective knowledge exchange across structural and organisational boundaries to coordinate and manage the interface discrepancies. Distributed Situation Awareness (DSA), with its focus on the knowledge transactions between social and technical systems, allows the analysis of knowledge exchange in the offsite and onsite interfaces. A case study of roof-hanger buildability incident is presented. The data are collected in the one case project in the UK through direct observations on-site, semi-structured interviews, and documents and emails. Three main phases were identified in the incident: The transition, response to the discrepancies, and reactive measures. The analysis shows that there was a decrease in coordination and knowledge exchange in all three phases. It is concluded that viewing the knowledge transactions in the incident from a socio-technical perspective made it possible to determine who knows what at a given time. This ultimately makes it possible to show knowledge interdependence in the project system.
| Item Type: | Conference Paper (Paper) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | distributed situation awareness; knowledge exchange; interface discrepancies; organisational interfaces; offsite construction |
| Index terms: | boundaries, interview, buildability, direct observation, interdependence, documents, knowledge exchange, socio-technical, coordination, roof, onsite, case study |
| Subjects: | professional development, design efficiency, management, data collection methods, building construction, property law, research methods, design practice, knowledge management, organizational analysis |
| Topics: | Engineering Principles, Design Practice, Information Management, Organizational Design, Research Practice, Construction Technology, Legal Issues |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here