Twum, B A; Kabiri, S and Tutt, D (2023) Managing onsite production pressure and its impact on safety performance in construction: An activity theory analysis. In: Tutesigensi, A and Neilson, C J (eds.) Proceedings of 39th Annual ARCOM Conference, 4-6 September 2023, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Abstract
Production pressure is a known contributing factor to accidents on construction projects. However, a detailed understanding of how disparate project groups use the contract and programme when confronted with production pressures and its impact on site safety is limited. Based on an ethnographic case study of a large building project in Accra-Ghana, activity theory is applied to analyse how the contract and programme used at the interface of distinct project groups feature in production pressure incidents and its impact on safety performance. The findings revealed that the project team collaboratively made a situated use of the tools for decision-making in managing the production pressure, where production demands were prioritised over safety. Acceleration as an adaptive practice was used in determining the number of additional workers, machinery, and equipment to hire. Second, productivity-based incentives were also used in negotiating early task completion targets with the workers. The practices adopted prioritised production, which, in turn, increased unsafe practices leading to accidents. This study provides ethnographic insights into the tension between safety and production demands and its impact on safety performance.
| Item Type: | Conference Paper (Paper) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | production pressure; safety; activity theory; accidents; construction |
| Index terms: | acceleration, construction project, programme, productivity, onsite, Ghana, case study, decision-making, safety performance, negotiating, project team, Accra, activity theory |
| Subjects: | production management, project delivery, management, conflict resolution, Geography, project controls, data collection methods, building construction, theoretical framing, decision analysis, occupational health and safety management |
| Topics: | Business Strategy, Time Control, Geographical Context, Project Management, Construction Technology, Health and Safety, Stakeholder Management, Risk Management, Research Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here