Vohmann, B (2023) Undergraduate built environment courses and the post-COVID legacy for learning. In: Tutesigensi, A and Neilson, C J (eds.) Proceedings of 39th Annual ARCOM Conference, 4-6 September 2023, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Abstract
Accredited undergraduate built environment courses are designed to prepare students as industry practitioners with appropriate knowledge, skills, and competencies, and accordingly students undertake real-world practice-based learning activities. During the lockdown of the Covid-19 pandemic, learning was, by necessity, moved to online. New problems and solutions evolved for tutors and students as all had to revise their approach. This presented challenges, there was a need to make enhanced use of technology and to encourage students to take a different approach to their learning. This paper seeks to better understand students' perceptions of learning in the enforced online experience and explore whether students had changed their learning approach in the online environment, to better understand their perspective. From this, it was hoped to gain insight as to whether any pedagogic adjustments would benefit from being developed in the post-covid era. Data for this study was gathered through an online survey of undergraduates in their final year of a built environment course and was conducted in the post-Covid era. Findings suggest that students had recognised the value of dialogue, had become more independent as learners, and were more proactive in their learning.
| Item Type: | Conference Paper (Paper) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | built environment; education; undergraduate learning |
| Index terms: | practitioner, built environment, undergraduate, pandemic, COVID-19, survey |
| Subjects: | curriculum development, data collection methods, practitioner, infrastructure and transport systems, health risk and incident analysis |
| Topics: | Education, Urban Studies, Roles and Professions, Research Practice, Health and Safety |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here