Dang, C N; Le-Hoai, L and Peansupap, V (2021) Effect of encouragement-based management mechanism on construction firms' manpower development: An empirical study from Vietnam. Construction Economics and Building, 21(2), pp. 58-80. ISSN 2204-9029
Abstract
The construction industry should seek to enrich its workforces due to the increasing lack of trained and skilled employees. This study attempts to investigate the relationship between encouragement-based management mechanism (EMM) and manpower development (MD) in construction firms and examine the moderating effect of firm size on this relationship by conducting bivariate Pearson correlation and hierarchical multiple regression analyses to analyse empirical data collected from 79 construction firms in Vietnam. The results show that EMM positively affected MD, and this positive effect was stronger in small/medium-sized construction firms than in large firms. The findings could provide construction firms in Vietnam, as well as other developing countries, with a better understanding of the effect of EMM on MD. Hence, they could establish appropriate and wise encouragement-based strategies to enhance their manpower. This study could contribute to the extant literature on construction manpower development by providing empirical evidence of the EMM−MD relationship in the context of construction firms.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction firm; construction industry; encouragement; management mechanism; manpower development |
| Index terms: | strategy, construction firm, encouragement, Vietnam, developing country, construction industry, multiple regression analysis, empirical study, management mechanism, evidence |
| Subjects: | statistical analysis, industry analysis, development economics, Geography, research methods, management, organization, evaluation and assessment methods |
| Topics: | International Construction, Human Resources, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Business Strategy |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here