Bronke, J; Lindeblad, L; Aabjerg, U and Klitgaard, A (2024) Where are all the women at? Insights from the Danish construction educational system. In: Thomson, C (ed.) Proceedings of 40th Annual ARCOM Conference, 2-4 September 2024, London South Bank University, UK.
Abstract
Less than 10% of employees in the Danish construction industry are women, and even fewer are in management positions. This paper investigates why still so few women are attracted to an education in an industry with an abundance of career possibilities and a dire need of employees. Do the expectations of traditional gender roles contribute to women turning their backs on the industry or does the system create a self-fulfilling prophecy? Using a mixed-method approach, with 334 responses on three sets of questionnaires and multiple interviews with relevant representatives in the industry, the findings suggest that there is a significant difference in the way male and female Constructing Architect students view women's roles in the construction industry. This becomes apparent when examining one of the leading educational programs for prospective leaders and managers in the construction industry. Thus, showing a systemic blindness that can be traced back through the school system. We can conclude that from the perspectives of the students, the construction industry's reputation is both archaic and discriminatory and can influence the educational choices of women.
| Item Type: | Conference Paper (Paper) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | gender in construction; systemic blindness; higher education; workforce necessity; majority blindness |
| Index terms: | construction industry, program, career, questionnaire, women, architect, higher education, interview, manager |
| Subjects: | software systems, professional development, educational institutions, sociology, industry analysis, data collection methods, profession, practitioner |
| Topics: | Education, Digital Applications, Roles and Professions, Research Practice, Information Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here