Huang, J; Abadi, M and Yeow, J (2024) Policy implications for factors of steel reuse in circular construction supply chains: A system thinking perspective. In: Thomson, C (ed.) Proceedings of 40th Annual ARCOM Conference, 2-4 September 2024, London South Bank University, UK.
Abstract
The construction industry consumed over half of the steel manufactured. Steel has strong credentials for circular economy for being recyclable and reusable. However, steel reuse at its end of life has been a rare practice in construction due to various barriers, compared with its recycling. This study aims to investigate causal relationships between factors influencing stakeholders' considerations for steel reuse initiatives through the lens of system thinking. It draws upon secondary data provided by the 'Delivering Innovative Steel ReUse ProjecT' database. Twenty-one factors were identified and classified into four groups with four types of intervention policies proposed. Findings showed the significance of early supply chain engagement, cost, time, and technical capability in stakeholders' decision-making. The interplay among the factors and stakeholders exhibited reinforcing feedback loops revealing that the leverage point for promoting steel reuse resides at the integration of the supply chain. Future studies may consider collecting primary data to validate the factors and the associated causal relationships and undertaking quantitative analysis using system dynamics simulation to inform policy decision-making.
| Item Type: | Conference Paper (Paper) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | circular economy; steel; construction supply chains; reuse; system thinking |
| Index terms: | secondary data, circular economy, database, recycling, end of life, feedback loop, construction supply chain, system dynamics, decision-making, integration, future study, policy implication, quantitative analysis, construction industry |
| Subjects: | waste management, construction logistics, control systems, computing systems, data collection methods, policy studies, research design and methodology, data analysis and analytics, strategic project management, sustainable design, industry analysis, organizational analysis, data management, decision analysis |
| Topics: | Digital Applications, Supply Chain Management, Organizational Design, Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Project Management, Risk Management, Sustainability, Governance |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here