Lawani, K; Thomson, C; Hare, B and Duplicki, A (2024) Unpacking the perceptions of high-density living and zoning laws: A case of Philadelphia area, USA. In: Thomson, C (ed.) Proceedings of 40th Annual ARCOM Conference, 2-4 September 2024, London South Bank University, UK.
Abstract
America’s residential housing model of suburban sprawl has its own environmental impact compared to high-density residential models that are believed to operate more efficiently in other places. There is hesitation in America regarding enacting changes towards a more sustainable model. An understanding of the barriers inhibiting the implementation of high-density residential model is fundamental to changes in the current system. This study evaluated American perceptions of current living models; high-density models and understanding of zoning laws. A mixed-method approach was adopted involving 207 questionnaires with 14 follow-up interviews from participants in the Philadelphia area. Findings suggest young adults' preference for high-density living with concerns for housing affordability and inequality crisis in America. The sampled population lacked awareness of residential high-density models and what it physically embodies including its impact on the surrounding population. Findings suggest lack of understanding of the zoning laws that have perpetuated America’s sprawling living model. These results are significant for planners; developers; and proponents of high-density models regarding planning housing models that sets up America into a more sustainable future.
| Item Type: | Conference Paper (Paper) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | high-density living; zoning laws; suburban sprawl; Philadelphia |
| Index terms: | density, interview, housing affordability, residential housing, inequality, population, planner, zoning, environmental impact, questionnaire, implementation, preference, housing |
| Subjects: | environmental impact, profession, construction type, data collection methods, analytical methods, contractual arrangements, urban planning, decision-making and reasoning, industry analysis, sociology, demography |
| Topics: | Ethics, Urban Studies, Research Practice, Business Strategy, Construction Technology, Procurement, Governance, Sustainability, Roles and Professions |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here