Ljung, E and Tallgren, M V (2024) Can interoperability between disciplines be improved by adding phasing information using standardised coding? In: Thomson, C (ed.) Proceedings of 40th Annual ARCOM Conference, 2-4 September 2024, London South Bank University, UK.
Abstract
With the increase of digitalisation in the construction industry, the need for structuring and classifying data is imperative. Due to the fragmentation and specialisation of the industry, digitalisation risks leading to a disconnect between the involved disciplines' different classification systems, impeding the interoperability of data transfer between disciplines. Thus, there is a need to explore how to capture the communication of data between different disciplines, leveraging the possibilities of multiple variables interconnect classifications of different disciplines. We applied a two-stage qualitative study focused on a specific part of a project, consisting first of interviews with practitioners and then a workshop with classification experts. We examined the use of standardised information in communication between disciplines. The main findings show that there are standards that support multiple properties that allow interconnections between disciplines; however, the currently used standards lack these possibilities. Thus, this paper contributes to the field through showing how the implementation of such a standard can solve challenges with interoperability and communication between disciplines.
| Item Type: | Conference Paper (Paper) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | building information modelling; ISO/iec 81346; classification systems; interoperability; project-data communication |
| Index terms: | workshop, digitalization, specialization, building information modelling, interview, ISO, qualitative study, fragmentation, practitioner, interoperability, implementation, construction industry |
| Subjects: | industry analysis, information systems, systems and processes, practitioner, construction type, data collection methods, research design and methodology, business, contractual arrangements, digital technology, standards development |
| Topics: | Organizational Design, Digital Applications, Quality Management, Roles and Professions, Construction Technology, Procurement, Business Strategy, Research Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here