Meifrinaldi, S R C P (2024) Stakeholder readiness for integrated project delivery in public sector construction: The role of maturity models. In: Thomson, C (ed.) Proceedings of 40th Annual ARCOM Conference, 2-4 September 2024, London South Bank University, UK.
Abstract
Integrated Project Delivery (IPD) is a collaborative method that enhances project outcomes in public construction. The transition to IPD in public projects introduces unique challenges, including strict regulatory compliance, transparent management of public funds, and balancing diverse community expectations. Additionally, public projects struggle with implementing IPD's shared risk-reward model and fostering interdisciplinary collaboration. Recognising these challenges for stakeholders such as government bodies, consultants, and contractors, this study emphasizes the need to assess and improve stakeholder readiness for IPD in the public sector. The study proposes using Maturity Models, known for their effectiveness in various sectors, to evaluate and elevate readiness across dimensions like knowledge, attitudes, and actions. The core of this study is a literature review that examines existing Maturity Models and their potential adaptation for public sector stakeholders. The study proposes preliminary principles for a conceptual framework to evaluate stakeholder readiness for IPD, outlining key elements that need to be considered in this context. This approach offers a structured pathway for enhancing stakeholder readiness for IPD, aiming to contribute to more successful public construction outcomes.
| Item Type: | Conference Paper (Paper) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | collaboration; integrated project delivery; maturity models; public construction projects; stakeholder readiness |
| Index terms: | dimension, interdisciplinary collaboration, public sector, effectiveness, public construction, collaboration, maturity model, conceptual framework, public project, literature review, project outcome, integrated project delivery, regulatory compliance, adaptation |
| Subjects: | management, research design and methodology, performance management, infrastructure engineering, administrative law, environmental policy, user focus, data analysis and analytics, contractual arrangements, project completion, building construction, theoretical framing, health monitoring assessment and metrics, evaluation |
| Topics: | Engineering Principles, Procurement, Project Management, Organizational Design, Design Practice, Legal Issues, Sustainability, Research Practice, Health and Safety, Quality Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here