Baborska-Narozny, M; Szulgowska-Zgrzywa, M; Mokrzecka, M; Chmielewska, A; Fidorow-Kaprawy, N; Stefanowicz, E; Piechurski, K and Laska, M (2020) Climate justice: Air quality and transitions from solid fuel heating. Buildings & Cities, 1(1), pp. 120-140. ISSN 2632-6655
Abstract
Of all the European Union’s member states, Poland has the most acute ambient air pollution problem. An urgent transition from solid-fuel heating (e.g. coal and wood) in the housing sector is required to improve air quality in the country. National regulations still allow the sale of solid fuels for heating, but some municipalities impose local resolutions with binding deadlines for solid-fuel bans. A real-world study covering 422 apartments in heritage tenements in Wrocław is presented. A link between domestic solid-fuel usage and tenure type is identified: solid fuels prevail in social housing. The transition to other forms of heating will adversely affect the inhabitants already vulnerable to fuel poverty. Solid fuel proves to be the least preferred heating option and is linked to substandard living conditions. Fuel poverty vulnerability for low-income households is established based on cost analysis for different heating options, thermal retrofit strategies, internal temperatures and apartment sizes. The results indicate that climate injustice is likely to occur for the poorest inhabitants due to their inability to afford increased costs. Policy implications to address this injustice are needed to ensure the transition from solid-fuel heating will avoid new vulnerabilities. Policy relevance Domestic solid-fuel combustion for heating purposes is linked to poor air quality in urban areas in Poland. Heritage tenements are the most technically deprived building stock and their inhabitants are already vulnerable to fuel poverty. To improve air quality and respond to climate change, solid fuels need to be substituted with less polluting but more expensive heating options. Potential climate injustice (harm) is likely to occur if the poorest inhabitants cannot afford to heat their homes due to a ban on solid fuels. The change of heating needs to be combined with additional support (thermal retrofit and appropriate pricing of alternative fuels). Air quality-driven polices focused on solid-fuel eradication should not ignore fuel poverty already experienced mainly by social housing residents using expensive electric heating on a standard tariff. Fuel poverty has a gender aspect related to the gender pay gap that needs addressing. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | built environment; climate justice; fuel poverty; housing; Poland; poverty; retrofit; space heating; vulnerability |
| Index terms: | air pollution, vulnerability, wood, built environment, pricing, fuel poverty, climate justice, tenure, income, air quality, household, building stock, living condition, resolution, cost analysis, regulation, social housing, housing, poverty, urban area, Poland, thermal retrofit, strategy, commons, space heating, policy implication, European Union, option, climate change, municipality |
| Subjects: | infrastructure and transport systems, physical geography and landforms, asset management, climate science, urban form and morphology, financial and cost management, social equity, energy systems, traditional and composite building materials, policy studies, political science, housing and residential development, property law, mechanical systems, demography, management, economic analysis, construction type, Geography, sociology, environmental hazards, decision analysis, real estate economics, conflict resolution, energy efficiency, administrative law |
| Topics: | Risk Management, Design Practice, Engineering Principles, Sustainability, Construction Technology, Ethics, Business Strategy, Stakeholder Management, Legal Issues, Urban Studies, Governance, Construction Materials, Cost Management, Geographical Context |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here