Hamstead, Z; Coseo, P; Alkhaled, S; Boamah, E F; Hondula, D M; Middel, A and Rajkovich, N (2020) Thermally resilient communities: Creating a socio-technical collaborative response to extreme temperatures. Buildings & Cities, 1(1), pp. 218-232. ISSN 2632-6655
Abstract
Extreme temperatures claim more lives than any other weather-related event, posing escalating socio-technical and governance challenges that few urban communities have addressed in a systematic, coordinated and comprehensive way. Scholars have only recently begun to investigate the granular scales at which distributions of thermal risk are produced, people’s individual subjective thermal experiences and environmental justice dimensions of the hazard. Advances in research pave the way for concomitant improvements in management and policies, but bridges are needed to connect the thermal vulnerability knowledge base with place-based protective practices that are climatically, politically and culturally appropriate. The research presented in this paper uses actor–network theory (ANT) to describe the planning phase framework of a socio-technical collaborative for managing thermal extremes. The Thermally Resilient Communities Collaborative (TRCC) is a framework for planning and test-bed design phases of a thermal management system. Drawing lessons from two case studies, the framework examines how socio-cognitive spaces for collaboration change with technical and policy disruptions, and provides a way to design experiments that test how technical and governance interventions can enable collective action around urban thermal management. Practice relevance Thermal extremes claim more lives than all other weather events and pose an escalating socio-technical challenge. Often the problem is exacerbated by lack of clarity about organizational responsibilities and coordination between local governmental departments or agencies. The TRCC framework can be used to understand current practices, identify data gaps and create opportunities to engage in cross-sectoral management. This approach engages actors in identifying built environments and societal practices that create hazardous indoor and outdoor thermal conditions, develops effective ways to convey microclimate information and peoples' subjective thermal experiences to responders and prevention planners, and elevates experiences of marginalized communities. The TRCC describes how governance networks are harnessed to solve collective action problems by integrating new data, technology, and governance capacities. Two case studies indicate how this process was used to create capacities to protect vulnerable people from the impacts of extreme temperatures in two US cities: Tempe, Arizona, and Buffalo, New York.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | cities; climate justice; cold vulnerability; collaborative governance; equity; hazard planning; heat vulnerability; public health; resilience; thermal conditions |
| Index terms: | coordination, weather, dimension, agency, prevention, planner, vulnerability, built environment, design phase, collaboration, collective action, microclimate, marginalized community, experiment, public health, New York, climate justice, urban community, drawing, resilient community, management system, governance, socio-technical, case study, knowledge base, justice |
| Subjects: | health monitoring assessment and metrics, professional practice, legal systems, technical documentation, climate science, community and social dimensions, air quality, business, data collection methods, profession, environmental health, environmental hazards, information systems, communities and social development, infrastructure and transport systems, sociology, demography, social equity, financial risk, Geography, research methods, management |
| Topics: | Design Practice, Legal Issues, Urban Studies, Digital Applications, Organizational Design, Cost Management, Health and Safety, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Engineering Principles, Roles and Professions, Stakeholder Management, Sustainability, Governance |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here