Kuittinen, M and Häkkinen, T (2020) Reduced carbon footprints of buildings: New Finnish standards and assessments. Buildings & Cities, 1(1), pp. 182-197. ISSN 2632-6655
Abstract
The Nordic countries are working towards regional carbon neutrality ahead of the European Union’s goals. Finland is aiming at carbon neutrality by 2035, and developing a set of policies, including legislation for low-carbon construction. The new approach includes normative carbon limits for different building types before 2025. Finland’s Ministry of the Environment has developed an assessment method and will develop a generic emission database. The database will cover all main types of products and materials, sources of energy, modes of transportation as well as other main processes such as site operations and waste management. Furthermore, the criteria for green public procurement have been developed from the viewpoint of reducing the climate impacts of buildings: incorporating global warming potential and climate benefits. However, there are several open questions regarding both the assessment method and the database. These questions are outlined and discussed. The consideration of the foreseen decarbonisation of energy, the relation of the generic data to specific data and the requirements for generating valid generic data are key issues of discussion. The Finnish assessment method is also compared with the methodological development in other Nordic countries and to the proposed Level(s) framework of the European Commission.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | buildings; carbon footprint; carbon handprint; database; Finland; life-cycle assessment; net zero; standards |
| Index terms: | net zero, waste management, low-carbon construction, site operation, Finland, global warming, European Union, database, carbon footprint, legislation, neutrality |
| Subjects: | data management, Geography, physical geography and landforms, ethical practice, legal systems, energy systems, operations management, sustainability and energy, waste management, environmental impact, climate science |
| Topics: | Sustainability, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Site Management, Legal Issues, Digital Applications |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here