Simpson, K; Janda, K B and Owen, A (2020) Preparing 'middle actors' to deliver zero-carbon building transitions. Buildings & Cities, 1(1), pp. 610-624. ISSN 2632-6655
Abstract
The urgent transition to a zero-carbon economy requires building professionals to be supportive of, and prepared for, delivering zero-carbon buildings. Building professionals are important 'middle actors' who can either enable or inhibit such societal transitions. This paper explores building professionals' perspectives on delivering zero-carbon buildings, leading to a practical synthesis of knowledge and skill requirements and training pathways. It draws on the middle-out perspective (MOP) and secondary analysis of three UK case studies. The MOP suggests that middle actors in a system are not perfectly responsive to policy push or market pull. Instead, they exert their own agency and capacity downstream to customers and clients, sideways to other middle actors and, occasionally, upstream to policy-makers. The data comprise: interviews and a small survey with building professionals on energy efficiency and refurbishment; the observation of a specific commercial office building design and development and a workshop to identify zero-carbon knowledge and skill needs of middle actors. Building professionals addressed in this paper include vocational trades, engineers, designers, project managers and 'clerks of works' (site-based quality technicians). Although formal training pathways for these roles differ, each can develop expertise 'sideways' interacting between professions. Practice relevance • Collaboration between academia, vocational training and industry could support sideways initiatives to better enable delivery of zero-carbon buildings. • Policy-makers and regulators need to create routes to capture, listen to and use the perspectives of building professionals. At present, these actors have very little upstream influence. • Middle-actor groups in construction undertake different activities, but share training routes, knowledge support systems and professional networks. • These routes, systems and networks would allow actors to facilitate change from the 'middle-out' in a way complementary to top-down change driven by policy and bottom-up changes led by citizens. • Training routes can include formal, on-the-job (informal) or e-learning. Prioritising on-the-job knowledge-sharing could promote upskilling. • Roles such as a clerk of works could assist in overseeing construction processes. • Vocational professionals are the priority group of middle actors to build capacity, knowledge and influence.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction industry; delivery; influence; innovation; middle-out; UK; vocational education and training; zero carbon |
| Index terms: | e-learning, collaboration, profession, building professional, construction process, academia, vocational education and training, clerk of works, agency, construction industry, energy efficiency, interview, building design, vocational training, secondary analysis, workshop, project manager, case study, prioritizing, commercial office, engineer, designer, regulator, survey |
| Subjects: | student development, industry analysis, decision analysis, sociology, educational institutions, building construction, educational technology, professional development, management, architectural design, data science, sustainability and energy, institututions, practitioner, construction type, profession, data collection methods |
| Topics: | Sustainability, Construction Technology, Risk Management, Stakeholder Management, Roles and Professions, Research Practice, Education, Organizational Design, Site Management, Design Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here