Mainstreaming zero carbon: Lessons for built-environment education and training

Stevenson, F and Kwok, A (2020) Mainstreaming zero carbon: Lessons for built-environment education and training. Buildings & Cities, 1(1), pp. 687-696. ISSN 2632-6655

Abstract

Highlights Education and training are identified as a key means of reducing carbon emissions from buildings to help address the climate emergency. Institutional, industry and organisational responses are shown to be failing in this regard. This editorial introduces the themes and individual papers in the special issue and then explores the current state of the art through pedagogy, theory, training, policy, practice and standards. These areas are interrogated through three fundamental questions. How can education and training be rapidly changed to ensure the creation of zero-carbon built environments? How can this transition be implemented successfully? What positive examples and models can be drawn upon or adapted? In proposing an agenda for change, a new approach to education is set out which combines learning outcomes with new standards and personal values within a continual questioning and holding to account of all stakeholders involved through evidenced outcomes. This draws on evidence from the special issue and Capability Theory which allies competency with personhood to create capability through agency. The process to make this change requires: (1) government intervention, to ensure that the lowest common denominator is zero-carbon best practice within a negotiated, holistic approach to developing the built environment sustainably; (2) new ethical, interdisciplinary and collective educational working practices underpinned by new pedagogical theory and accreditation processes; and (3) rapid auditing and upskilling in climate literacy to bring pressure to bear on governments and institutions to carry out reforms.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: accreditation; built environment; capability; climate change; education; policy; practices; reform; sustainability; training; zero carbon
Index terms: state of the art, climate change, personal value, evidence, working practice, built environment, editorial, learning outcome, mainstreaming, education and training, pedagogy, carbon emission, best practice, holistic approach, agency
Subjects: infrastructure and transport systems, behavioral psychology, management, evaluation and assessment methods, teaching methods, climate science, business, sociology, research dissemination and communication, professional education, student development
Topics: Organizational Design, Business Strategy, Education, Urban Studies, Sustainability, Research Practice
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here