Retrofitting traditional buildings: A risk-management framework integrating energy and moisture

Gori, V; Marincioni, V and Altamirano-Medina, H (2021) Retrofitting traditional buildings: A risk-management framework integrating energy and moisture. Buildings & Cities, 2(1), pp. 411-424. ISSN 2632-6655

Abstract

Traditional buildings constitute a large proportion of the building stock in many countries worldwide; around 40% of the UK’s housing stock was built before 1940 and was primarily made with solid masonry walls. Only 11% of UK solid-walled dwellings had insulation installed, suggesting the high potential of the low-carbon retrofit of traditional buildings. However, there is evidence of the occurrence of unintended consequences, often associated with excess moisture. A method is presented for moisture risk management that includes the development of a process and a framework. These tools are then integrated into a novel framework for the combined energy and moisture performance retrofit of traditional buildings. An example of the framework’s practical application is provided, with a focus on retrofit measures for solid-wall insulation. The proposed systematic approach demonstrates the interconnected nature of energy and moisture. It harmonises the principles needed to support organisations in the delivery of robust retrofit of traditional buildings through the integration of pre-retrofit building assessment and post-retrofit monitoring in the process. The risk-management process and framework presented can be valuable tools to support designers in providing robust and scalable retrofit measures and strategies. Practice relevance: An integrated energy and moisture risk-management process is presented to support designers in the retrofit of traditional buildings. This is accompanied by a framework that explains the steps required for moisture risk management at the various stages of the retrofit process. This systematic approach harmonises the principles needed to support organisations in delivering robust low-carbon retrofits and integrates pre- and post-retrofit building assessment in the process. While previous work has addressed energy and moisture management separately, this integrates the two aspects into a framework for risk management. An example illustrates the relevant modes and methods of assessment and monitoring in support of risk management. When combined with practical guidelines and training, the risk-management process and framework can be valuable tools to provide robust and scalable retrofit measures and strategies. The framework was developed within the context of the UK construction industry; it can be adapted to other contexts.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: building assessment; building monitoring; building stocks; energy; moisture risk; retrofit; retrofit strategy; risk assessment; solid-wall insulation; traditional buildings
Index terms: insulation, retrofit strategy, retrofitting, construction industry, evidence, building monitoring, risk management, integration, traditional building, monitoring, risk assessment, designer, housing stock, building stock, solid-wall insulation, strategy, unintended consequence, building assessment, moisture risk
Subjects: industry analysis, environmental hazards, organizational analysis, asset management, financial risk, renovation and retrofit, management, building materials, materials science, control systems, evaluation and assessment methods, profession, construction type, risk assessment
Topics: Design Practice, Site Management, Organizational Design, Business Strategy, Cost Management, Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Roles and Professions, Risk Management, Sustainability, Construction Technology
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here