The future of IEQ in green building certifications

Licina, D; Wargocki, P; Pyke, C and Altomonte, S (2021) The future of IEQ in green building certifications. Buildings & Cities, 2(1), pp. 907-927. ISSN 2632-6655

Abstract

Although indoor environmental quality (IEQ) and human health have been on the agenda of the green building industry, a new emphasis is being placed on building features that explicitly promote the experience of occupants. However, evidence of the performance of green-certified buildings from the occupant perspective remains inconsistent, with numerous questions on how to effectively design, assess and promote 'healthy buildings'. Focusing on the key IEQ categories of indoor air quality, thermal comfort, lighting and acoustics, this paper synthesises emerging knowledge related to IEQ and health; identifies research and practical challenges that may impede the performance of green-rated buildings; sets the foundations for researchers and green rating system developers to capture immediate and long-term opportunities; and proposes a new framework for green-certified buildings. The envisioned future of green buildings will need to be based on a thorough knowledge of the building and its users, their inter-and intra-individual variability, their spatiotemporal localisation, their activities, their history of exposures, together with a capacity of anticipation of the likelihood of future events and preparedness for them. A balanced, integrated, consideration of these factors can provide the basis for more effective green building certification systems.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: building standards; buildings; environmental assessment; green buildings; health; indoor environmental quality; labelling; occupant comfort; sustainability
Index terms: comfort, foundations, history, indoor environmental quality, indoor air quality, green building certification, human health, localization, evidence, green rating, green building, variability, environmental assessment, exposure, thermal comfort
Subjects: occupational health and safety management, environmental engineering, public and environmental health, design practice, urban planning, sustainability assessment, sustainable design, structural engineering, architectural and construction history, evaluation and assessment methods, environmental impact, environmental health, statistical analysis
Topics: Health and Safety, Governance, Research Practice, Design Practice, Engineering Principles, Sustainability
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here