Australian non-domestic buildings policy as an international exemplar

Mallaburn, P; Azhari, R; Fawcett, T and Topouzi, M (2021) Australian non-domestic buildings policy as an international exemplar. Buildings & Cities, 2(1), pp. 318-335. ISSN 2632-6655

Abstract

The Australian policy approach, based on the NABERS energy performance benchmarking scheme for commercial offices, is promoted as a 'success story' and is of interest to governments internationally. This paper explores the evidence for the impacts of the Australian approach on energy use and carbon emissions, identifies the key elements of its conception, design and implementation, and investigates the role of government. It uses a mixture of literature review, re-analysis of quantitative data and analysis of 30 original stakeholder interviews. The literature suggests that NABERS' appeal to multiple benefits of energy efficiency and its place in the wider policy mix should help deliver positive results. Analysis of publicly available data has highlighted data gaps. However, evidence suggests significant energy savings have been made, although the attribution to NABERS alone, given the policy mix, is uncertain. The interviews show high levels of agreement that the policy mix has transformed large commercial office buildings. They also highlight the wide range of actors mobilised to deliver this change and the central role of well-designed government intervention and support. The Australian experience is rightly of interest to international governments, but they must recognise that replicating its success requires attention to detail and long-term commitment.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: energy efficiency policy; governance; multiple benefits; non-domestic buildings; offices; performance standards and disclosure; policy mix
Index terms: benchmarking, energy use, implementation, energy performance, policy mix, evidence, energy-saving, performance standards and disclosure, non-domestic building, commitment, commercial office, literature review, energy efficiency policy, carbon emission, governance, replicating, energy efficiency, interview
Subjects: regulatory law, research management, performance measurement, contractual arrangements, data analysis and analytics, energy systems, psychology, public policy, sustainability and energy, climate science, data collection methods, evaluation and assessment methods, construction type, business, policy studies
Topics: Governance, Sustainability, Construction Technology, Procurement, Research Practice, Organizational Design, Quality Management, Legal Issues
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here