COVID-19 mobility restrictions: Impacts on urban air quality and health

Mohajeri, N; Walch, A; Gudmundsson, A; Heaviside, C; Askari, S; Wilkinson, P and Davies, M (2021) COVID-19 mobility restrictions: Impacts on urban air quality and health. Buildings & Cities, 2(1), pp. 759-778. ISSN 2632-6655

Abstract

In 2020, Covid-19-related mobility restrictions resulted in the most extensive human-made air-quality changes ever recorded. The changes in mobility are quantified in terms of outdoor air pollution (concentrations of PM2.5 and NO2 ) and the associated health impacts in four UK cities (Greater London, Cardiff, Edinburgh and Belfast). After applying a weather-corrected machine learning (ML) technique, all four cities show NO2 and PM2.5 concentration anomalies in 2020 when compared with the ML-predicted values for that year. The NO2 anomalies are –21% for Greater London, –19% for Cardiff, –27% for Belfast and –41% for Edinburgh. The PM2.5 anomalies are 7% for Greater London, –1% for Cardiff, –15% for Edinburgh, –14% for Belfast. All the negative anomalies, which indicate air pollution at a lower level than expected from the weather conditions, are attributable to the mobility restrictions imposed by the Covid-19 lockdowns. Spearman rank-order correlations show a significant correlation between the lowering of NO2 levels and reduction in public transport (p < 0.05) and driving (p < 0.05), which is associated with a decline in NO2-attributable mortality. These positive effects of the mobility restrictions on public health can be used to evaluate policies for improved outdoor air quality.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: air pollution; air quality; cities; Covid-19; environmental health; lockdown; machine learning; mobility; NO<sub>2</sub>; PM<sub>2.5</sub>; public health; transport; vehicles
Index terms: air quality, machine learning, weather, outdoor air quality, environmental health, public transport, public health, mortality, mobility, air pollution, London, COVID-19
Subjects: artificial intelligence, health risk and incident analysis, health monitoring assessment and metrics, air quality, Geography, climate science, infrastructure and transport systems, environmental health
Topics: Urban Studies, Digital Applications, Health and Safety, Geographical Context, Sustainability
Descriptive scope: 2 PC

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here