Regulating urban densification: What factors should be used?

Teller, J (2021) Regulating urban densification: What factors should be used? Buildings & Cities, 2(1), pp. 302-317. ISSN 2632-6655

Abstract

<strong>Highlights</strong>Urban densification is increasingly accepted as a necessity and is important for no-net land take. Densification occurs in many places, especially fast-growing cities with a combination of demographic change, economic pressure and large transport infrastructure projects. The costs and benefits of density require a nuanced understanding: potential direct, indirect and cumulative effects (environmental, economic and social), both on- and off-site. The optimisation of densities implies a need to identify the conditions that can create the most value for the city, specify the places most appropriate for future inhabitants and activities, and promote spatial justice. The papers published in this special issue converge in depicting urban densification as a complex, nonlinear process, which has to be addressed at various scales. Multifactorial metrics of density are superior to aggregated ones because they offer a better understanding of the urban forms and how they are experienced by inhabitants and users. Both hard and soft densification have to be duly monitored and regulated if cities are to avoid overcrowding of places and buildings, which can be detrimental to urban resilience. The relation between urban densification and housing affordability is a critical factor that policymakers must address.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: affordable housing; cities; density; land take; land use; social practices; urban densification; urban planning
Index terms: critical factor, land use, densification, housing affordability, land take, transport infrastructure, density, justice, urban densification, urban planning, urban resilience, social practice, urban form, affordable housing
Subjects: industry analysis, infrastructure and transport systems, urban design, social theory, population and demographics, urban form and morphology, land economics, analytical methods, legal systems, real estate economics, sustainability and resilience, urban planning, risk assessment, construction type
Topics: Risk Management, Governance, Construction Technology, Business Strategy, Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Urban Studies, Legal Issues
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here