Wade, F and Visscher, H (2021) Retrofit at scale: Accelerating capabilities for domestic building stocks. Buildings & Cities, 2(1), pp. 800-811. ISSN 2632-6655
Abstract
Retrofitting domestic buildings is essential for meeting targets to mitigate the catastrophic impacts of our changing climate. Current rates of retrofitting are far lower than necessary for achieving global net zero climate targets. To date in privately owned homes, policymakers have largely relied on piecemeal activity and often short-lived retrofitting programmes and financial incentives. Consequently, this special issue explores what capabilities and capacities are needed to deliver retrofit at scale. Looking across different scales—national, municipal, neighbourhood and individual sites—this special issue provides insights to shape policies, organisational structures and delivery strategies for different scales, building types and supply chain actors. These papers highlight the need for a clearer definition of what retrofit incorporates, alongside the collection of high-quality data and rigorous building metrics. In addition, diverse business models are needed to ensure that a variety of actors across the public and private sectors are well positioned to engage in coordinating building retrofit at scale. Finally, it is essential that any acceleration of retrofitting activity is coupled with consumer protection mechanisms and support for developing supply chains which incorporates both existing workers and encouragement for new entrants. It is only through this multifaceted approach that domestic building retrofit can be delivered at the speed and scale necessary.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | building stocks; buildings; capabilities; construction industry; energy; governance; housing; mitigation; net zero; renovation; residential; retrofiretrofit strategy; supply chain |
| Index terms: | renovation, net zero, mitigation, business model, construction industry, acceleration, housing, retrofitting, financial incentive, organizational structure, governance, building stock, strategy, private sector, domestic building, programme, encouragement |
| Subjects: | construction type, business, energy systems, economic analysis, management, renovation and retrofit, financial risk, project controls, sociology, asset management, industry analysis |
| Topics: | Construction Technology, Sustainability, Governance, Cost Management, Business Strategy, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Time Control, Organizational Design, Human Resources |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here