Internal thermal mass for passive cooling and ventilation: Adaptive comfort limits, ideal quantities, embodied carbon

De Toldi, T; Craig, S and Sushama, L (2022) Internal thermal mass for passive cooling and ventilation: Adaptive comfort limits, ideal quantities, embodied carbon. Buildings & Cities, 3(1), pp. 42-67. ISSN 2632-6655

Abstract

How effective is naturally ventilated internal thermal mass for obviating air-conditioning, mitigating heatwaves and storing carbon in buildings? This study combines detailed climate model outputs with scaling rules for optimizing internal thermal mass coupled with buoyancy ventilation. It identifies regions where this passive design strategy is most effective during future heatwaves and determines how much internal thermal mass each person needs to stay comfortable in these regions, with a special focus on Canada. Results suggest that naturally ventilated internal thermal mass is likely to become less effective due to future global heating. Regions where internal thermal mass will no longer be sufficient to obviate air-conditioning and where it can still play a significant role in hybrid cooling are identified. By comparing the ideal per capita thermal mass quantities in different regions, it is found that biomass-based materials require approximately 3.5 times the volume of cementitious materials to perform equivalently, if thermal proportions for surface area and thickness are respected. Finally, an analysis of the per capita embodied carbon of these ideal internal thermal mass quantities is undertaken, suggesting a fair functional unit to compare thermal mass materials. PRACTICE RELEVANCE High-resolution Canadian maps and lower-resolution global maps are developed in this study to allow practitioners to distinguish between areas where internal thermal mass should be sufficient to obviate air-conditioning and where supplementary cooling is needed. Ideal per capita quantities of different thermal mass materials are given for each region, with guidelines for how to distribute this thermal mass internally in walls, floors and ceilings, and how the surface area and thickness of the thermal mass scales with the thermal properties of the material and the per capita heat loads and ventilation and temperature damping requirements. As such, this study suggests how thermal mass materials can be compared fairly in terms of performance and embodied carbon at the preliminary stages of design.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: building design; cooling; cooling technologies; demographics; energy use; environmental impacts; passive cooling; standards; thermal mass
Index terms: energy use, demographics, ventilation, heatwave, thermal property, resolution, maps, Canada, scaling, environmental impact, practitioner, adaptive comfort, building design, strategy, embodied carbon, thickness, passive design
Subjects: energy systems, air quality, sustainability and energy, spatial and geospatial analysis, materials science, climate science, human factors, architectural design, Geography, environmental impact, practitioner, conflict resolution, material properties and characteristics, organization, demography, management
Topics: Geographical Context, Construction Materials, Urban Studies, Business Strategy, Stakeholder Management, Roles and Professions, Sustainability, Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Design Practice
Descriptive scope: 3 PCT

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here