Grassie, D; Schwartz, Y; Symonds, P; Korolija, I; Mavrogianni, A and Mumovic, D (2022) Energy retrofit and passive cooling: Overheating and air quality in primary schools. Buildings & Cities, 3(1), pp. 204-225. ISSN 2632-6655
Abstract
While building stock modelling has been used previously to investigate the space heating demand implications of national energy efficiency retrofitting, there are also implications for indoor overheating and air quality, particularly in schools, with highly intermittent occupancy patterns. This paper assesses indoor overheating risk and air quality within an English classroom stock model containing 111 archetypes, based on the analysis of the nationwide Property Data Survey Programme (PDSP) containing 9629 primary school buildings in England. Metrics for indoor temperatures, heating demand and concentrations of three contaminants (CO2, NO2, PM2.5) were estimated in naturally ventilated classrooms, while exploring future climate projections, retrofit and overheating mitigation scenarios to analyse school stock resilience. Classrooms with a south-east orientation experience around four to six times the overheating-hours compared with those with a northern orientation. Post-1976 archetypes are most susceptible to overheating, indicative of the conflict between better insulated and airtight classrooms and overheating prevention. A range of retrofit and passive cooling measures can mitigate against overheating alone, although mechanically driven cooling and filtration may be required towards the 2080s. While no single measure predicted universally positive effects for building performance, night ventilation and overhangs were found to be particularly effective passive overheating mitigation methods across the school stock.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | building stock; energy model; indoor environment; overheating; retrofit; school buildings; UK |
| Index terms: | ventilation, indoor environment, programme, survey, overheating, energy model, stock model, building stock, building performance, indoor temperature, England, energy efficiency, retrofitting, prevention, modelling, space heating, archetype, mitigation, school building, classroom, air quality |
| Subjects: | asset management, project controls, quality assurance, thermal systems, renovation and retrofit, financial risk, Geography, modelling and simulation, sustainability and energy, analytical methods, economic analysis, environmental science, energy systems, air quality, mechanical systems, data collection methods, construction type, climate science |
| Topics: | Time Control, Quality Management, Construction Technology, Sustainability, Business Strategy, Cost Management, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Engineering Principles |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here