Socioeconomic and livelihood impacts within Bangkok's expanding metropolitan region

Gullette, G; Thebpanya, P and Singto, S (2022) Socioeconomic and livelihood impacts within Bangkok's expanding metropolitan region. Buildings & Cities, 3(1), pp. 808-823. ISSN 2632-6655

Abstract

Recent national development plans in Thailand have incorporated concepts of sustainability, livelihood rights, and human dignity. Yet, development and urban expansion have unfolded in unexpected ways, complicating the socioeconomic and ecological integrity of peri-urban and rural spaces. This paper explores the ways in which urban expansion and state development within rural peripheries reshape political economies and, in so doing, the nature of vulnerability and precarity. Using ethnographic data collected among agrarian households in Samut Prakan province and among domestic migrant laborers in the Bangkok Metropolitan Region (BMR), the research considers the socioeconomic and ecological effects of peripheral areas' tighter integration into expanding urban geographies. In effect, to what degree does urban development unfolding in the BMR improve people’s lives and, simultaneously, rework the dynamics of vulnerability and precarity experienced among those laboring in marginal spaces of the economy? A broad array of ethnographic and Landsat data demonstrates that families and individuals must renegotiate livelihood strategies to mitigate the sociopolitical, economic, and environmental outcomes of development. The findings demonstrate how agrarian families manage the structural and stochastic shocks and pressures of development in urbanizing landscapes and what this means for the future of smallholders situated within changing national economies.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: agrarian change; bangkok; cities; development policies; land use; livelihoods; peri-urban; spatial displacement; Thailand; urban expansion
Index terms: dynamics, household, political economy, integration, vulnerability, Thailand, national economy, urban development, urban geography, rework, integrity, strategy, landsat, land use
Subjects: economic analysis, real estate economics, operations management, economic and policy analysis, systems engineering, environmental hazards, geographical techniques and analysis, demography, organizational analysis, health safety and environment, Geography, urban design, management
Topics: Organizational Design, Urban Studies, Sustainability, Business Strategy, Health and Safety, Project Management, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Engineering Principles
Descriptive scope: 2 PC

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here