Emissions from a net-zero building in India: Life cycle assessment

Jain, M and Rawal, R (2022) Emissions from a net-zero building in India: Life cycle assessment. Buildings & Cities, 3(1), pp. 398-416. ISSN 2632-6655

Abstract

This study quantifies the gap between net-zero energy and net-zero carbon through a life cycle assessment (LCA) of a net-zero energy building (NZEB) in Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India. The annual net-zero energy evaluations of a building do not account for the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions released before the building operation phases. Nor does it account for the GHG emissions during the end-of-life processes. As a consequence, an NZEB may not be a net-zero emission building over its lifespan. Comprehensive carbon-based evaluations are necessary to ensure an overall reduction in emissions is in line with the goals of the United Nations Paris Agreement. The LCA frameworks of ISO 14040 and EN 15978 form the basis of analysis and a method is presented based on data collection, consistency checks, uncertainty evaluation, impact assessment and interpretation of the results. It also acknowledges the lack of a nationalised inventory for LCA in India. The results show that despite an annual net-zero operation status of a building, the building has a negative impact with 866 tCO2 e across a calculated lifespan of 60 years. The case study reveals the sensitivities of the analysis towards the system boundary, data quality requirements and acceptable limits of uncertainty.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: buildings; carbon footprint; embodied carbon; India; life cycle assessment; net-zero carbon; net-zero energy
Index terms: building operation, impact assessment, Paris, case study, embodied carbon, greenhouse gas, ISO, lifespan, net-zero energy building, life cycle assessment, zero-emission building, inventory, carbon footprint, India, United Nations
Subjects: standards development, value management, data collection methods, Geography, sustainable design, inventory management, material degradation and durability, management, climate science, sustainable engineering, environmental impact, institutional frameworks
Topics: Quality Management, Geographical Context, Business Strategy, Governance, Supply Chain Management, Project Management, Engineering Principles, Sustainability, Research Practice, Construction Materials
Descriptive scope: 3 PCE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here