Masculine roles and practices in homes with photovoltaic systems

Mechlenborg, M and Gram-Hanssen, K (2022) Masculine roles and practices in homes with photovoltaic systems. Buildings & Cities, 3(1), pp. 638-652. ISSN 2632-6655

Abstract

Privately owned, domestic photovoltaic (PV) panels can play an important role in the transition to a low-carbon society by producing renewable energy for the grid and engaging households in energy management. In both aspects, gender is an issue, leading to the development of new theoretical concepts, e.g. the 'resource man', the 'flexibility woman' and the 'mother-multiple'. However, a deeper understanding of the role of masculinity may reveal gender complicity and can inform the design of these technologies to be more inclusive. This ethnographic study investigates masculine roles, practices and domesticities for energy management activities in the home. It examines Danish PV owners as domestic prosumers based on in-depth qualitative interviews of 18 participants in 12 households. The use of PV technologies (and their interfaces) reproduces several masculine domesticities that work both productively and counterproductively with feminine domesticities. Technology and energy management are often situated as male hobbies related to masculine self-expression, identity and homemaking. To unlock the full potential of sustainable energy engagement consumption and practices, both masculine and feminine approaches are needed at the conceptual and practical levels. PRACTICE RELEVANCE The successful deployment and operation of domestic PV systems depends on aligning the timing of production and consumption of energy in a household. This involves both traditional male and female domains within a household. Significant gaps in understandings, communication and practices were found in many households due to gendered roles. This compromises the potential of domestic generation of renewable energy. Awareness of gender relations can promote the integration and improve practices by providing households with information about technical and less technical aspects of time-shifting practices. Both feminine and masculine understandings of technology, practices and energy consumption are necessary for a more effective transition to the use of smart energy technologies, and with a more equal distribution of these competencies and practices in households with heterosexual couples. In addition, the design and usability of smart energy technology should embrace the needs of both female and male users. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. See http://creativecommons.org/ licenses/by/4.0/.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: Denmark; domesticity; emerging technologies; energy systems; feminist; gender; homes; photovoltaics; smart home; social practices; usability
Index terms: identity, social practice, energy consumption, owner, renewable energy, household, consumption, emerging technology, integration, usability, smart energy, Denmark, energy system, sustainable energy, energy management, masculinity, smart home, low-carbon society, interview, commons, photovoltaic
Subjects: social theory, property law, sustainability and energy, consumer economics, sociology, user-centered design, Geography, sustainability assessment, design practice, demography, data collection methods, renewable energy, organizational analysis, energy systems, innovation and technology management
Topics: Sustainability, Organizational Design, Stakeholder Management, Design Practice, Research Practice, Digital Applications, Geographical Context, Urban Studies, Legal Issues
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here