Mohareb, E; Gillich, A and Bristow, D (2022) Participation in domestic energy retrofit programmes: Key spatio-temporal drivers. Buildings & Cities, 3(1), pp. 356-375. ISSN 2632-6655
Abstract
The Canadian government created the EcoENEGY Retrofit for Homes programme (2007– 12) to improve residential energy efficiency and reduce emissions produced through energy use. The uptake of retrofits varied both spatially and temporally. This research examines spatio-temporal patterns of retrofit adoption to understand the drivers behind participation in the grant programme and assess how future grant-based programmes might improve the uptake of efficiency measures. Temporal analysis demonstrated continued growth of programme participation over its original period of availability, and this accelerated once the programme was extended for an additional year after its original closure date. However, some spatial correlations weakened, which may be attributable to changes in programme design during the extension period. Seasonal variation was also observed, with spikes in retrofit activity occurring in winter. A regression analysis for conversion rates in Ontario and British Columbia displayed significant positive correlations for high shelter costs (>30% of household income) and households occupied by usual residents (regular occupants). Population density, median property value (only in Ontario) and units that were recently occupied demonstrated negative correlations. Spatial variation at both the city and neighbourhood levels suggests a greater degree of programme customisation is required to ensure uniform building stock improvement. POLICY RELEVANCE Domestic retrofit will be a crucial component of every developed nation’s net zero strategy. For example, in Canada and the UK, houses account for 13% and 20% of energy-related greenhouse gas emissions, respectively. This paper explores trends in the most recently completed national retrofit programme in Canada, demonstrating rates of adoption across the programme, the effects of programme design modification, and the value of an understood programme brand and format for uptake. Further, when faced with tighter deadlines, there is a weakening of the relationship between adoption and spatially.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | Canada; energy efficiency; housing; market transformation; programme design; residential; retrofit; retrofit grants; technology adoption |
| Index terms: | efficiency, conversion, density, winter, customization, energy efficiency, design modification, building stock, residential energy, strategy, property value, programme, Canada, variation, net zero, population, household, greenhouse gas emission, income, market transformation, energy use, seasonal variation, housing, technology adoption, regression analysis |
| Subjects: | analytical methods, economic analysis, innovation and technology management, energy systems, real estate economics, sustainability and energy, construction manufacturing, climate science, economic and policy analysis, construction type, environmental health, statistical analysis, asset management, demography, project controls, design changes, Geography, contractual condition, performance management, manufacturing engineering, management |
| Topics: | Contract Administration, Time Control, Quality Management, Urban Studies, Design Practice, Sustainability, Construction Technology, Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Business Strategy |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here