Towards sufficiency and solidarity: COP27 implications for construction and property

Ness, D (2022) Towards sufficiency and solidarity: COP27 implications for construction and property. Buildings & Cities, 3(1), pp. 912-919. ISSN 2632-6655

Abstract

With COP27 being held in Egypt, a non-Western country, poorer and adversely impacted societies will demand a stronger say in negotiations. There is increased pressure on the rich to dramatically reduce their emissions, provide reparation for past damage and exploitation, and assist poorer nations to improve social livelihoods. Such a new world order will require that global inequity in resource consumption be placed in the spotlight, with fair shares demanded for all. Calling for drastic and urgent action and a paradigm shift to contain warming to 1.5°C, the 2022 IPCC report Climate Change 2022 emphasised the need for 'sufficiency' to avoid demand for resources while providing wellbeing for all within planetary limits. However, responses to date have been grossly inadequate, amid continued economic growth and policies based upon resource efficiency, renewables and a circular economy. This is most evident in the construction and property sectors, where high rates of new construction continue in both the Global North and South, while claiming this is green and carbon neutral. Bolder, more ambitious policies are proposed that seek to rebalance construction to suit needs, not wants, and especially to restrain the excesses of the property industry driven by financialisation.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: built environment; carbon budget; climate finance; climate policy; commercial property; construction; consumption; equity; global South; real estate; sufficiency
Index terms: paradigm, exploitation, circular economy, well-being, commercial property, Egypt, society, negotiation, climate change, economic growth, built environment, consumption, real estate, resource consumption, resource efficiency, climate policy
Subjects: communities and social development, consumer economics, economic development, climate policy, education and knowledge transfer, infrastructure and transport systems, climate science, environmental resource management, mental health and wellbeing, Geography, construction type, real estate economics, sustainable design, conflict resolution, management
Topics: Construction Technology, Research Practice, Sustainability, Business Strategy, Stakeholder Management, Urban Studies, Geographical Context, Health and Safety
Descriptive scope: 3 PCT

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here