Pelsmakers, S and Warwick, E (2022) Housing adaptability: New research, emerging practices and challenges. Buildings & Cities, 3(1), pp. 605-618. ISSN 2632-6655
Abstract
HIGHLIGHTS The underlying issues of why housing adaptability is important today are introduced, together with the drivers and barriers to uptake. This editorial explains the different kinds of adaptability (environmental, spatial, social and multi-use(r)) and how they can be achieved. The themes and individual papers in this special issue are discussed, together with their individual, community and societal importance. The global pandemic highlighted the realities of achieving incremental spatial adaptations, but also the attitudinal changes enabling temporary 'choreographing' of different social uses of spaces. New methods for investigating housing adaptability are also highlighted to better understand occupants' needs and to demonstrate how adaptability adds value to occupants. Residents have an active role in undertaking temporal adaptations. However, this depends on provisions made by clients, developers, designers and managers involving the layout, design and multifunctional uses of space. This includes making outdoor spaces more adaptable and developing scenarios that allow dwellings to accommodate changes over time (daily, seasonally and over life-course cycles). Adaptable approaches rely on careful planning and design of room layouts (and the services that support them) to enable connection between rooms and different uses of rooms without restriction of use by residents. Housing adaptability should be based on inclusivity and equity.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | adaptability; adaptation; cohabitation; flexibility; housing; liveability; resident experience; resilience; wellbeing |
| Index terms: | adaptation, pandemic, liveability, well-being, manager, editorial, adaptability, housing, designer |
| Subjects: | construction type, practitioner, health risk and incident analysis, research dissemination and communication, mental health and wellbeing, profession, user focus |
| Topics: | Research Practice, Health and Safety, Design Practice, Roles and Professions, Urban Studies, Construction Technology |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here