Peters, T and Masoudinejad, S (2022) Balconies as adaptable spaces in apartment housing. Buildings & Cities, 3(1), pp. 265-278. ISSN 2632-6655
Abstract
New requirements for living, working, and learning at home due to Covid-19 have highlighted two fundamental needs in apartment housing: (1) adaptability to fit multiple functions in a limited area; and (2) access to private outdoor space to support residents' health and wellbeing, and to provide spatial and thermal variety in small units. The two needs may initially appear to be disconnected: when residents have a high demand for flexibility and adaptability in apartment housing, balconies tend to be overlooked as potential spaces to facilitate adaptability. An analysis of several international housing projects with innovative balcony designs and unit designs is the basis for the identification of several typologies of balconies. Typologies of adaptable balconies and examples are used to show how they may support housing adaptability within a dwelling. The 'adaptable balcony' concept is introduced in the context of multifamily housing design, together with a clear definition of active and passive adaptability by inhabitants.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | adaptability; balconies; dwelling; flexible housing; housing; multifamily housing; social norms; spatial adaptability; spatial use |
| Index terms: | housing design, housing project, COVID-19, social norms, housing, health and wellbeing, adaptability |
| Subjects: | health risk and incident analysis, design process, construction type, user focus, social justice, mental health and wellbeing, housing and residential development |
| Topics: | Design Practice, Ethics, Construction Technology, Health and Safety, Urban Studies |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here