Schoenefeldt, H (2022) Technological transitions in climate control: Lessons from the House of Lords. Buildings & Cities, 3(1), pp. 68-92. ISSN 2632-6655
Abstract
Mechanical air-conditioning is only a relatively recent development in countries with moderate temperate climates. It was preceded by earlier, less energy-intensive methods of climate control. These methods were deployed in British public buildings from the 1830s until the mid-20th century, when heritage buildings began to be adapted for air-conditioning. The 19th-century methods for providing thermal comfort are examined within the debating chamber of the House of Lords (part the Houses of Parliament in London, UK). This was equipped with facilities for ventilation, cooling, heating, humidification and air purification. These facilities, introduced in 1854, were in use for 112 years. This example shows the idea that thermal comfort is a cultural practice, which was not independent from the particular technologies or social contexts, but substantively shaped by them. This long operational history provides a basis for critical insights into their performance and operation, and also illuminates the cultural and technical factors leading to their substitution with air-conditioning in 1966.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | air-conditioning; alternative technology; architectural technology; cooling; environmental control; heritage buildings; technological change; temperate climate; thermal comfort |
| Index terms: | London, ventilation, architectural technology, thermal comfort, alternative technology, heritage building, environmental control, technological change, history, climate control, public building |
| Subjects: | construction type, Geography, environmental engineering, design practice, architectural and construction history, innovation studies, air quality, factor and component analysis |
| Topics: | Sustainability, Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Design Practice, Business Strategy, Geographical Context, Construction Technology |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here