Christermaller, F; Ibrahim, C K I C; Manu, P; Belayutham, S; Mahamadu, A-M and Yunusa-Kaltungo, A (2022) Implementation of design for safety (dfs) in construction in developing countries: A study of designers in Malaysia. Construction Economics and Building, 22(2), pp. 1-26. ISSN 2204-9029
Abstract
Design for Safety (DfS) is a concept that emphasises eliminating health and safety hazards to construction workers in the design phase. However, despite the importance of DfS implementation, there are limited studies on DfS in developing countries, including Malaysia. This research, therefore, investigates DfS implementation among design professionals in the Malaysian construction industry through a questionnaire survey. The response was analysed by conducting descriptive analyses and inferential statistical tests. The findings revealed a high implementation of DfS practices among designers parallel with having high awareness of DfS concept and a positive attitude towards DfS implementation. However, the engagement in DfS professional training is low, despite the fact that the designers showed a high interest in DfS professional training. While the findings revealed limited association between the implementation of DfS practices and designers' professional body membership, designers' professional role, and the size of designers' organisation, the findings also showed that DfS awareness and DfS training were associated with greater implementation of DfS practices. Furthermore, the design professionals perceive DfS education, client’s influence and DfS legislation as being the most important factors that affect DfS implementation in Malaysia. This study adds to the current DfS body of knowledge by providing deeper insights into the current state of designer awareness, education training, influencing factors, and DfS engagement, especially when DfS legislative framework is in place. Such findings could serve as a guide for other countries in the event of future developments related to DfS implementation.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction; construction safety; design; design for safety; Malaysia. |
| Index terms: | health and safety, influencing factor, legislation, Malaysia, developing country, survey, designer, design phase, questionnaire, design for safety, statistical test, body of knowledge, implementation, construction industry, construction worker, construction safety |
| Subjects: | statistical analysis, environmental health, industry analysis, development economics, Geography, health safety and environment, contractual arrangements, knowledge management, legal systems, professional practice, practitioner, profession, risk assessment, data collection methods |
| Topics: | Design Practice, Legal Issues, International Construction, Health and Safety, Information Management, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Risk Management, Roles and Professions, Sustainability, Procurement |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here