Smektała, M and Baborska-Narożny, M (2022) The use of apartment balconies: Context, design and social norms. Buildings & Cities, 3(1), pp. 134-152. ISSN 2632-6655
Abstract
The role of a balcony is well recognised in the history of urban living. If designed carefully, balconies fit certain spatial and normative contexts and respond to residents' needs. This study examines how balconies are used and what variables influence the variety and intensity of their usage. A non-participatory observation of 3000 balconies in Wrocław, Poland, was followed by interviews with relevant stakeholders. Key questions were: How do people adapt balconies to their personal needs and for what types of activities do they use balconies? Interviews (n = 41) were conducted with developers' representatives, estates agents, architects and residents. Results indicate what kind of physical features (size, dimensions) or contextual features (orientation, exposure, community pattern) affect balconies' usage. The residents' activities performed on balconies and type of furniture are presented: their features, estate characteristics and surrounding context. Interviews with industry stakeholders reveal that developers and designers have a poor understanding of how balconies are actually used: their assumptions are that balconies are used for leisure and not for other functions. This research identifies and confirms the variety of balconies' functions, and the most crucial features of well-designed balconies are adaptability and responsiveness to context.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | adaptability; balconies; dwelling; flexible housing; housing; social norms; spatial adaptability; spatial use |
| Index terms: | Poland, adaptability, architect, housing, dimension, history, exposure, agent, interview, social norms, designer |
| Subjects: | health monitoring assessment and metrics, architectural and construction history, construction type, profession, data collection methods, user focus, practitioner, social justice, public and environmental health, Geography |
| Topics: | Construction Technology, Roles and Professions, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Health and Safety, Ethics, Design Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here