Energy, emerging technologies and gender in homes

Strengers, Y; Gram-Hanssen, K; Dahlgren, K and Aagaard, L K (2022) Energy, emerging technologies and gender in homes. Buildings & Cities, 3(1), pp. 842-853. ISSN 2632-6655

Abstract

This special issue explores a key question in the energy transition: how are visions, relationships and practices with emerging technologies gendered, and what does this mean for home relations and energy outcomes? Homes are deeply gendered spaces where labour, care, technology management and household responsibilities are unequally distributed. Yet, as the papers in this special issue reveal, policy and industry visions tend to overlook gendered dynamics associated with these technologies, reflecting a perceived technology neutrality. This oversight puts the energy transition at risk. This special issue reveals how understanding the gender impacts of emerging technologies is crucial for realising energy policy, regulatory and building efficiency aspirations. The collection identifies how technology use, energy consumption and everyday practices in homes reflect gendered differences. Studies from diverse empirical and geographical contexts explore questions of gender in relation to emerging technologies such as energy feedback portals, smart home systems, home efficiency improvements, electric vehicles, solar photovoltaic panels and home batteries. Recommendations are provided for policymakers, and house, technology and program designers, to achieve an equitable energy transition. The collection demonstrates the need for concerted policy and industry attention to gendered dynamics in order to ensure inclusive energy policy and technology development.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: care; digital housekeeping; emerging technologies; energy; everyday life; gender; homes; housing; smart home; social practices
Index terms: electric vehicle, technology development, housing, energy consumption, program, household, dynamics, emerging technology, social practice, photovoltaic, energy policy, smart home, designer, everyday life, efficiency, neutrality, technology management, energy feedback
Subjects: design practice, software systems, performance management, social theory, demography, sociology, transportation engineering, systems engineering, construction type, profession, innovation studies, public policy, ethical practice, innovation and technology management, energy systems
Topics: Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Business Strategy, Construction Technology, Governance, Sustainability, Roles and Professions, Quality Management, Design Practice, Digital Applications, Urban Studies
Descriptive scope: 3 PCT

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here