A residential emissions-based carbon levy: City and neighbourhood consequences

Anderson, B (2023) A residential emissions-based carbon levy: City and neighbourhood consequences. Buildings & Cities, 4(1), pp. 545-564. ISSN 2632-6655

Abstract

What are the consequences of a local carbon levy applied to (1) all estimated residential consumption emissions and (2) all residential gas and grid electricity-related emissions? Housing stock simulations in the City of Southampton, UK, are used to explore whether a local carbon levy could pay for retrofits at a local level. The value of the levy is estimated for the whole city and for neighbourhoods at the census lower layer super output area (LSOA) level (about 1500 households) using recently published 'official' carbon values under two scenarios. The levy is then set against an estimate of the cost of retrofitting energy-efficient dwellings in each LSOA. The models show that highly emitting LSOAs (generally those with least deprivation) would raise sufficient levy to retrofit their dwellings within three to five years if an 'all emissions' levy were applied. This is not the case in low-emissions LSOAs which tend to be those with the highest deprivation. Here it could take up to 60 years to meet the retrofit costs if the levy were only applied to energy emissions. Redistribution of the levy from the least deprived but highly emitting neighbourhoods to the more deprived but least emitting would therefore be needed.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: building stock; carbon levy; carbon tax; energy efficiency; energy emissions; energy poverty; housing; local government; neighbourhood; retrofit; urban governance
Index terms: consumption, housing stock, building stock, deprivation, urban governance, housing, energy efficiency, retrofitting, local government, household, estimate, poverty
Subjects: social justice, sustainability and energy, financial and cost management, administrative law, asset management, consumer economics, industry analysis, construction type, renovation and retrofit, demography, sociology, urban planning
Topics: Ethics, Legal Issues, Cost Management, Sustainability, Stakeholder Management, Urban Studies, Construction Technology, Governance, Business Strategy, Engineering Principles
Descriptive scope: 2 PC

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here