The urban expansion of Berlin, 1862–1900: Hobrecht's plan

Bentlin, F (2023) The urban expansion of Berlin, 1862–1900: Hobrecht's plan. Buildings & Cities, 4(1), pp. 36-54. ISSN 2632-6655

Abstract

This paper investigates the original intentions and modifications of Berlin’s 19th-century urban development plan, particularly the different spatial configurations at the local level. The creation, adaptation and long-term impacts of the Hobrecht Plan of Berlin are assessed for urban design and planning principles used for urban expansion between 1862 and 1900. The 1862 'Development Plan for the Environs of Berlin' represents a cornerstone on which the inner city is built even to this day. Morphological analyses are used to describe design parameters and the associated design principles. The origins of ideas, spatial development and planning statements are examined in relation to each other based on written and drawn archival materials together with geographical information system-based plan analysis. Individual district plans and explanatory reports provide a basis for alternative interpretations of Hobrecht’s Berlin in 19th-century urban expansion planning. The example of Berlin illustrates the emergence and transition of 19th-century urban structures, as well as the design principles underpinning morphological aspects of street networks, public space systems and block patterns. This analysis serves as a reference in the history of European planning paradigms and urban planning models in general. It highlights the contribution of small-scale urban development with a focus on squares and local patterns.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: berlin; cities; hobrecht plan; master plan; urban design; urban development; urban expansion
Index terms: information system, history, Berlin, paradigm, inner city, urban development, adaptation, design principle, emergence, urban design, urban planning, spatial configuration, design parameter, street network, public space
Subjects: Geography, urban design, systems engineering, urban planning, architectural and construction history, design methods, education and knowledge transfer, land use and regional development, architectural design, urban design and public space, design constraints, information systems, user focus
Topics: Urban Studies, Governance, Engineering Principles, Digital Applications, Design Practice, Research Practice, Geographical Context
Descriptive scope: 3 PCT

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here