Çidik, M S (2023) Politics of social value in the built environment. Buildings & Cities, 4(1), pp. 475-487. ISSN 2632-6655
Abstract
The built environment can have a major impact on people’s economic prospects, health and wellbeing, and affect their everyday lived experiences. Additionally, due to their high costs, construction investments, which shape the built environment, involve high opportunity costs for society. Following from an increasing awareness of these issues, social value has become a rapidly growing area of research and practice in the built environment, accompanied by policy interest. Despite its popularity, theoretical engagement with the concept of 'social value' has been very limited. Particularly, so far, the politics emerging from subjectivity of value(s) have been either ignored or mentioned in a broad-brushed manner. However, the politics need to be considered at the core of any debates relating to social value due to the tensions between different views involved in conceptualising/analysing, creating/implementing and realising/experiencing social value. To address this gap, this paper introduces three types of politics of social value: analytical politics, participatory politics and lived politics. By clarifying these types of politics that are key to any social value consideration in the built environment, this will allow a deeper and more democratic engagement with the concept of social value.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | built environment; place; politics; public engagement; social value; spatial politics; stakeholder engagement; sustainable development goals |
| Index terms: | social value, sustainable development goal, stakeholder engagement, built environment, society, politics, public engagement, health and wellbeing, subjectivity |
| Subjects: | sociology, communities and social development, infrastructure and transport systems, political science, sustainable design, participation process, mental health and wellbeing, community and social dimensions, human factors and perception |
| Topics: | Urban Studies, Sustainability, Governance, Stakeholder Management, Research Practice, Health and Safety |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here