Croffi, J; Kroll, D; Soebarto, V; Barrie, H and McDougall, K (2023) Wellbeing fostered by design: A framework for evaluating indoor environment performance. Buildings & Cities, 4(1), pp. 507-523. ISSN 2632-6655
Abstract
High-rise urban development has been controversial for its inability to foster cohesive and flourishing neighbourhoods. A social value perspective can help to better understand and evaluate how new developments in dense urban settings affect places and communities. While the link between wellbeing and social value is well-established in the literature, the question of how design can affect wellbeing and thus contribute to the social value of a development still requires further research and clarification. A better understanding of this relationship can assist architects, developers or consultants during the design process. A review is presented of relevant quantifiable aspects of building design that affect wellbeing in relation to the indoor environment and to social value specifically. A framework for fostering wellbeing is developed to test these aspects and evaluate the indoor environment performance. A case study building is used to analyse the relationship between building design and wellbeing. These lessons can be used to inform and evaluate building design during the design phases to complement the assessment of qualitative factors within a social value framework.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | building design; building performance; indoor environment; social value; wellbeing |
| Index terms: | indoor environment, building performance, design process, case study, building design, qualitative factor, social value, architect, urban development, design phase, well-being |
| Subjects: | sociology, quality assurance, urban design, professional practice, data analysis and analytics, environmental science, architectural design, data collection methods, profession, mental health and wellbeing, design methods |
| Topics: | Quality Management, Urban Studies, Design Practice, Research Practice, Health and Safety, Sustainability, Roles and Professions |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here