Eyre, N; Fawcett, T; Topouzi, M; Killip, G; Oreszczyn, T; Jenkinson, K and Rosenow, J (2023) Fabric first: Is it still the right approach? Buildings & Cities, 4(1), pp. 965-972. ISSN 2632-6655
Abstract
'Fabric first' describes an approach to improving the thermal performance of residential buildings by prioritising the improvement of fabric. It has historically been widely advocated. However, the urgency of complete decarbonisation challenges this approach in existing buildings. Heat decarbonisation is necessary to deliver zero-carbon goals. In many cases, no additional fabric improvement is needed to decarbonise heating; a heat pump, or other zero-carbon heat supply, will be enough. Retrofitting fabric first may not be feasible across the whole housing stock on timescales necessary for rapid decarbonisation and could therefore slow housing decarbonisation. However, fabric improvement will continue to have an important role. Energy use in buildings with a 'heat pump only' retrofit will be higher than if insulation were also improved. Fabric should continue to be prioritised in new buildings and where low-cost insulation measures are available. Fabric improvement can have other benefits: lower running costs, improved comfort, reduced damp risk, better heat pump performance, reduced overheating risk and lower requirements for electricity capacity increases. The suitability of a heat-pump-only approach to building decarbonisation should therefore be decided building by building. For national building stocks, complete decarbonisation of heating systems is required, but stock average fabric improvement may be 30–50%.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | building insulation; building stock; buildings; climate policy; fabric first; heat decarbonisation; mitigation; public policy; space heating |
| Index terms: | mitigation, running cost, space heating, comfort, thermal performance, heat pump, insulation, retrofitting, housing, public policy, climate policy, energy use, suitability, prioritizing, heating system, residential building, building stock, housing stock, overheating |
| Subjects: | financial and cost management, energy systems, public policy, building materials, climate policy, mechanical systems, construction type, thermal systems, design criteria, industry analysis, decision analysis, asset management, occupational health and safety management, financial risk, renovation and retrofit |
| Topics: | Health and Safety, Business Strategy, Cost Management, Engineering Principles, Risk Management, Sustainability, Governance, Construction Technology, Design Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here