Heat stress: Adaptation measures in South African informal settlements

Hugo, J M (2023) Heat stress: Adaptation measures in South African informal settlements. Buildings & Cities, 4(1), pp. 55-73. ISSN 2632-6655

Abstract

Globally extreme weather events are experienced most acutely in cities. While formal settlements can respond to such events, informal settlements are often vulnerable and ill-prepared. Sub-Saharan Africa is rapidly urbanising with informal settlements that require effective climate change adaptation measures. Two climate adaptation strategies for informal dwellings are considered for their success under 2100 Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) climate scenarios. Using existing data collected from informal dwellings in South Africa, the findings from a digital simulation study reveal that cool roof paints can currently lower excessive heat stress conditions by 42–63% when applied to high thermal mass dwellings with poorly insulated lightweight corrugated sheeting roofing. However, for the future 2100 climate scenarios this strategy only lowers excessive heat stress conditions by 12–17%. This calls for the development of integrated multifaceted heat stress adaptation strategies for informal settlements in Sub-Saharan Africa.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: adaptation; albedo; climate change; cooling; dwellings; heat plan; heat stress; informal settlements; overheating; South Africa
Index terms: adaptation, Sub-Saharan Africa, overheating, strategy, cool roof, informal settlement, climate adaptation, roofing, heat stress, climate change, extreme weather event, South Africa
Subjects: design practice, physical geography and landforms, management, structural engineering, Geography, housing and residential development, environmental health, thermal systems, user focus, climate science
Topics: Business Strategy, Engineering Principles, Geographical Context, Sustainability, Urban Studies, Design Practice
Descriptive scope: 2 PC

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here