Karvonen, A and Hargreaves, T (2023) Data politics in the built environment. Buildings & Cities, 4(1), pp. 920-926. ISSN 2632-6655
Abstract
Buildings and cities are increasingly being reconfigured and re-imagined by flows of data. Smart homes and cities, digitally networked infrastructure services, shared mobility programmes and autonomous vehicles, surveillance and security systems, and urban control centres are a few of the many examples of how data are emerging as an influential driver of urban development processes. The aim of this special issue is to enhance our collective understanding of the practices, politics and power implications of data-driven buildings and cities. How are data generated, metabolised and gathered in the built environment? Who designs and governs these data flows, and to what end? Who and what are enrolled in the datafication of buildings and cities? What forms and types of data are collected, and what is ignored in data flows at and across different scales? What are the broader implications for social justice and equity? This editorial overviews the main issues of data politics for buildings and cities, summarises the four articles that comprise this special issue, and concludes with recommendations for policy, design and future research. While the contributors identify multiple negative aspects of datafication, they also suggest pathways to inform more progressive and emancipatory futures.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | buildings; cities; data politics; datafication; digitalisation; power; smart city; smart technology; social equity; urban data |
| Index terms: | social justice, programme, built environment, smart home, surveillance, urban development, mobility, editorial, digitalization, smart city, politics |
| Subjects: | urban sustainability, urban design, design practice, research dissemination and communication, digital technology, project controls, infrastructure and transport systems, sociology, political science, monitoring and control systems |
| Topics: | Time Control, Urban Studies, Governance, Design Practice, Digital Applications, Research Practice, Ethics |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 CT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here