Kretzschmar, D and Schiller, G (2023) Non-domestic building stock: Linking dynamics and spatial distributions. Buildings & Cities, 4(1), pp. 727-748. ISSN 2632-6655
Abstract
In contrast to domestic buildings, the drivers influencing the stock dynamics (construction subtracted by demolition) of non-domestic buildings (NDB) have not yet been researched on a use-class basis. For the first time, due to elaborated data sets on construction and demolition of NDB in Germany, an in-depth analysis of causal relationships is provided at a subnational level. This paper investigates the cause–effect relationships between influencing variables and stock dynamics of the three quantitatively most relevant use classes of the German NDB stock: office buildings, industrial buildings and warehouses. Influencing variables on the development of the stock were first identified by means of expert interviews. Regions with high construction dynamics were identified. Within these highly dynamic regions, construction activity was correlated with influencing variables. A principal component analysis was used to examine the explanatory power of underlying, use-class-specific components of the variable set. The results show the particular importance of employment-related variables. They combine demographic, economic and wealth-related influences and allow for a distinction to be made in relation to functional non-domestic-use classes. For the first time, this confirms that different use classes of NDB are characterised by different influencing variables, and that these variables recur to uncorrelated overarching drivers.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | building stock; buildings; construction rate; demolition; Germany; non-domestic buildings; planning; scenario planning; service life; spatio-temporal; trend analysis |
| Index terms: | stock dynamics, Germany, dynamics, principal component analysis, explanatory power, spatial distribution, service life, interview, domestic building, office building, scenario planning, non-domestic building, employment, construction activity, building stock, construction and demolition |
| Subjects: | systems engineering, statistical analysis, asset management, Geography, management, theoretical framing, geographical analysis, construction operations, economic analysis, waste management, data collection methods, construction type |
| Topics: | Site Management, Human Resources, Sustainability, Construction Technology, Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Business Strategy |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here