Building within planetary boundaries: Moving construction to stewardship

Kuittinen, M (2023) Building within planetary boundaries: Moving construction to stewardship. Buildings & Cities, 4(1), pp. 565-574. ISSN 2632-6655

Abstract

The consumption of materials and energy for construction is a serious challenge to contain global warming below 2°C. Growing population, increasing per capita floor areas, more frequent extreme weather events and related repair needs, and rising sea levels are all accelerating the demand for construction and driving resource use. Rapid and drastic reductions in global carbon emissions and robust approaches to climate-related events are required urgently to remain within the planetary boundaries. Therefore, a new hierarchy for solving spatial needs is required: the Global North should avoid making new buildings, where and whenever possible. Instead, using existing spaces, renovating, adapting or extending the existing buildings would be much preferred. Such a hierarchy must be applied with context sensitivity. Especially the social needs of developing countries or communities recovering from humanitarian disasters should be adequately met, including the option of new construction. However, for most developed regions where populations are stable, new construction should require considerable justification. New design, business models and legislation are needed to successfully implement this approach. Environmental norms and architectural policies can offer a complementary set of approaches for reducing unsustainable consumption of resources in construction. Because of the historical responsibility as well as the current climate leadership, a fair transition should start from Europe.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: built environment; climate change; construction; consumption; planetary boundaries; resources; sufficiency; trends
Index terms: global warming, developing country, legislation, carbon emission, Europe, humanitarian, consumption, extreme weather event, repair, boundaries, climate change, norms, option, population, built environment, business model
Subjects: infrastructure and transport systems, sociology, decision analysis, demography, development economics, maintenance engineering, physical geography and landforms, property law, legal systems, principle, climate science, consumer economics, business
Topics: Business Strategy, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Stakeholder Management, Risk Management, Sustainability, Legal Issues, Urban Studies, Ethics, International Construction
Descriptive scope: 2 PC

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here