The feeling of comfort in residential settings II: A quantitative model

Molina, G; Donn, M; Johnstone, M L and Macgregor, C (2023) The feeling of comfort in residential settings II: A quantitative model. Buildings & Cities, 4(1), pp. 441-456. ISSN 2632-6655

Abstract

Building science has historically used quantitative methods to study comfort. Yet, these methods struggle to consider non-quantifiable factors that are sometimes relevant in the determination of people’s comfort. The first article in this series argued that complementing quantitative methods with qualitative ones can help mitigate this limitation. A new model of comfort for residential environments is proposed—the feeling of comfort model—which is not constrained by the need to be quantifiable. Such a model offered new (although not final) insights into what comfort is, how it develops, and how it varies between individuals and groups of them. How can building performance simulations benefit from these qualitative insights? This question is explored by representing the feeling of comfort model mathematically and incorporating it into a building performance simulation program. Although an unvalidated proof of concept, the results from the simulation emulated some of the phenomena that current models struggle with. Insights produced by qualitative research can help develop quantitative methods and simulations that account for human cognition and psychology.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: agency; comfort; indoor environmental quality; inhabitants; model; residential; simulation; thermal comfort; thermal perception
Index terms: agency, psychology, building science, program, cognition, thermal perception, qualitative research, indoor environmental quality, building performance simulation, quantitative method, comfort, thermal comfort
Subjects: modelling and simulation, data analysis and analytics, engineering principles, research design and methodology, occupational health and safety management, cognitive psychology, sociology, behavioral psychology, environmental health, environmental engineering, software systems
Topics: Health and Safety, Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Sustainability, Digital Applications
Descriptive scope: 3 PCT

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here